I stumbled on it quite accidentally and didn't believe my eyes at first, but yes, this is an actual website with quite a lot of content (like I said, this content did not seem high-quality to me). Unbe-effing-lievable.
I stumbled on it quite accidentally and didn't believe my eyes at first, but yes, this is an actual website with quite a lot of content (like I said, this content did not seem high-quality to me). Unbe-effing-lievable.
poker:
[x] play 200 games
[x] watch 12 husng.com videos and take solid notes
[x] make weekly blog entries
[x] review the most interesting games
[x] post the most interesting hands on 2p2 HU forum and read it practically daily
other:
[] get to 30 push-ups, 20 jack-knives and 6 one-leg squats (at 20, 15 and 4 respectively atm)
[] select a fuseki to concentrate on and have at least a couple of lessons on it with my Go teacher
[x] play four serious Go games
[] see four movies
[] resume wushu training - once a week for starters + do a few movements every day
[x] learn Tom O'Bedlam by heart
Well, at least there are more X's than spaces.
Second, I've decided to make a separate poker blog, since I need to put goals down in writing somewhere and track my progress/make any other notes I feel like making, but I guess that most of my readers don't care all that much about poker. This new blog can be found at http://www.deucescracked.com/blogs/fansh
Last, but not least, here are my goals for November:
poker:
[] play 200 games
[] watch 12 husng.com videos and take solid notes
[] make weekly blog entries
[] review the most interesting games
[] post the most interesting hands on 2p2 HU forum and read it practically daily
other:
[] get to 30 push-ups, 20 jack-knives and 6 one-leg squats (at 20, 15 and 4 respectively atm)
[] select a fuseki to concentrate on and have at least a couple of lessons on it with my Go teacher
[] play four serious Go games
[] see four movies
[] resume wushu training - once a week for starters + do a few movements every day
[] learn Tom O'Bedlam by heart
JF is a very well-known Go historian and book translator, but I'm pretty sure this doesn't only apply to Go.
freerice.com is a great source of such info, as satisfying as it is useless.
Table '188389884 1' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: NRFanshawe (1520 in chips)
Seat 2: SxyRN69 (1480 in chips)
SxyRN69: posts small blind 10
NRFanshawe: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to NRFanshawe [5c Ac]
SxyRN69: raises 60 to 80
NRFanshawe: raises 180 to 260
SxyRN69: calls 180
*** FLOP *** [7d Jd 7c]
NRFanshawe: bets 260
SxyRN69: raises 960 to 1220 and is all-in
NRFanshawe: calls 960
*** TURN *** [7d Jd 7c] [Kc]
*** RIVER *** [7d Jd 7c Kc] [8c]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
NRFanshawe: shows [5c Ac] (a flush, Ace high)
SxyRN69: shows [4d 8d] (two pair, Eights and Sevens)
NRFanshawe collected 2960 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2960 | Rake 0
Board [7d Jd 7c Kc 8c]
Seat 1: NRFanshawe (big blind) showed [5c Ac] and won (2960) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 2: SxyRN69 (button) (small blind) showed [4d 8d] and lost with two pair, Eights and Sevens
The 3-bet was obviously not for value, but a "feeler". I didn't like calling a 4x raise. As for flop play it was really unclear, since these people often spazz like he did in the game (and yeah, people do call 3-bets with 48s at the $11.50 level on Stars). Still, I kinda feel like a donk. Am I right?
involving
whole numbers, toroidal constructs and spirituality which proposes to
explain life,
the universe and everything"
The funniest thing was that I found about this nutcase through my Baguazhang newsletter (yes, unfortunately Baguazhang attracts people who would be interested in this kind of thing way more often than they attract someone interested in actually walking the circle). There are videos of him on YouTube too. I haven't watched much, but his toroidal constructs are really cute. Also, his attire is hilarious.
Go figure.
The site slogan is quality, not quantity. The promise only the best coaches and the best qulity videos, etc, etc. One thing I have to concede: the videos mostly are quite good. Being a uNL player, I've mostly watched low stakes videos by SoCalQuest and they are really insightful. However, a site that openly states on its home page that it's better than all its rivals cannot have the following problems, in my opinion:
(1) Low audio quality - I stopped watching the C-betting video simply because I was tired of the speakers voice being intermittently not loud enough to be heard at the highest volume and too loud to be listened to at 70% volume. With other videos it wasn't quite as bad, but also far from stellar.
(2) Sub-par video quality in some cases - for instance, I find it hard to see the HUD stats in SoCalQuest's video. I don't care about it that much, but I can see HUD stats very well in DC live play videos, so it's not a problem with my monitor/eyes.
(3) Forums aren't tracked particularly well by the pros. This is again a sharp contrast with DC (my first post, for instance, got answers from two coaches). In fact, I've seen experienced players say that they value the DC forums not less than the videos. I'm fairly certain no BFP subscribers would say anything like that. Phil Galfond's statement on 2+2 that the site only sells videos and everything else is just extras explains his position, but doesn't help to sell a product significantly more expensive than rival ones.
(4) One of the biggest selling points for many was the presense of Ryan Fee. However, so far he's only done 5 videos. For those of us who don't play HU this number goes down to 2. The only explanation offered is that he had computer problems, but with the last video being published about 2 months ago this sounds like an excuse.
Overall, while the site certainly has a lot of valuable information, I'd recommend to check out some of its rivals first. Sorry if this review sounds too harsh. I'll be the first one to admit I'm spoilt by DC :)
#7. Dmitry Bykov, Listed Off (this is my own translation of the Russian title). Not bad and the portrayal of modern Russia is unfortunately spot on, but it gets too LJ-like on occasion. 5/10 (this is a fairly harsh mark, but it's in the genre which I tend to judge most strictly, since it's one thing if a book is competing with, good as it might be, The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, and quite another if one has to compare it to The Trial or The Blind Assassin).
#8. Agatha Christie. The Murder of Roger Ackroyd. I'm pretty much sure this is one of her best-known novels, and for a good reason too: it is quite amazing. It is so well-written that it was a delight to read even though I obviously knew who the murderer was (it's a little hard not to know, what with the book being touted as an example of a brilliant narrative device in so many sources). 10/10
More to follow.
As many of my friends know, I got more involved with poker in this year, switching from occasionally playing LHE to being seriously interested in NLHE. I'm still not playing a ton of hands, since I only play two tables, but I'm trying to take my game seriously and pick up us much knowledge as I can in the limited time I can devote to it. To this end, I've done a few things: read Bill Vosti's e-book, read the 2+2 stickies, read a few 2+2 books (PNL is not entirely uninteresting, but the hand examples are really far-fetched, NLHTAP seems to be better, but I've only read half of it so far) and, most importantly, joined DeucesCracked, a video training site. This brief description, I'd say, doesn't do justice to DC, since it also has a great community; from what I've seen so far, its forums are probably better than the 2+2 uNL forum, so as soon as I can manage to start posting my own hands, I'll be using the forums a lot.
An interesting feature of the training videos is that they come in series, which makes it a lot easier to decide what to watch and to process the information. So far I've mostly been watching a couple of series for beginning players, Baby Steps and From the Ground Up. Together, I think they form a great framework for understanding the basics of online 6-max NLHE games.
<lj-cut>
Baby Steps by tubasteve is actually a mini-series, which means that it ran in just four episodes. In the first one tubasteve plays two tables of 25NL in a really tight style. I can't remember exactly, but I think he said he ended up running like 15/13 for the session, or something like that. While this certainly seems very nitty, I think that it's not a bad idea to start out by folding most of the more marginal hands, sinds they'll tend to put beginners into tougher post-flop spots. Also, in case anyone wants to see how to open up one's game, the second video, where tubasteve plays 2 tables of 50NL will show how to do that and then some - tubasteve's really LAGged it up in it. I would say that for purely educational purposes, it was a little too early to do it in the second episode of a "noob" series, but it certainly made for fun watching.
In the third episode tubasteve reviews a video of his student's play, and I'd say I liked this episode best. The reason for that is that here we get to see mistakes typical for players at these stakes (25NL, I think), like not raising big enough preflop, not continuation betting on a board where one simply has to and so on, and get to hear Steve's comments on all these decisions. Steve does a very thorough job analyzing all the interesting situations, pausing the video when necessary, so I feel I've got a lot out of this. The series is wrapped up by a Hold'em Manager analysis of the first two episodes, with an emphasis on different HEM stats and reasonable ranges for them and a review of several notable hands. Overall, I'd rate the meni-series as a great introduction to uNL 6-max, although I'd say that From the Ground Up is of course more detailed.
And more detailed doesn't even begin to cover it. Not only it's a full series (8 episodes), but it also features two coaches, tubasteve and n0whereman, who go into great detail discussing nearly everything they talk about. Most videos run well over the one hour mark, so if you decide to watch it, be prepared to spend some time. I'll risk putting the cart before the horse and start with my conclusion: this is a very good introductory series and I feel that me game's improved a lot after watching it and trying to apply some of the concepts. More interestingly, some of the concepts I didn't plan to apply (like double barrelling, since I thought it usually wasn't a good idea at 25NL and I didn't have enough experience anyway) seem to have rubbed off one me somehow and I began doing it myself all of a sudden with a very reasonable success rate.
Anyway, let's get rolling. The first video, actually, doesn't even deal with actual poker play. I did however like it quite well, because it contains a lot of useful information on things one needs to do to succeed in poker. I think almost all the resourses I have ever heard of were described in sufficient detail (I say almost, because it doesn't mention Ryan Fee's guide, which is quite good) and a lot of good advice was given. The bankroll management advice is also probably a lot better than the default 20 BI which are probably outdated by now even for 25NL. Another thing I liked was the recommendation to only play two tables while learning and not more than four until one "graduates" from SSNL. This seems quite sound to me and corresponds to opinions of such authorities as fees and DJ Sensei, for instance.
The second video deals with basic preflop play. It outlines a fairly tight PF strategy, which isn't optimal by the authors' own concession, but allows to avoid a lot of tough spots postflop, which is obviously a good thing for a beginning player. I would say that this strategy is a little*too* tight if not for the presence of another preflop episode that outlines how to open up one's game. The video also discusses in sufficient detail (for an introductory video, mind you) the subjects of playing versus a raise and 3-betting.
The third video was probably my favorite of the whole series. Anyone who's so much as opened a poker book or a poker strategy site has probably heard of board texture. If not, close that poker site and go read the 2+2 forums sticky threads. However, before watching FTGU the concept seemed somewhat vague to me, even though I've seen it discussed a lot. I mean, obviously AKQ monotone flow is a wetter one than Q72 rainbow, but there must be more to the concept than this, right? The video offers a very thorough discussion of flop textures and in which situations it is profitable to C-bet. The flops aren't merely classified, but for each kind a detailed analysis of what portions of the opponent's range and your perceived range it hits is given, making the whys and the wherefores of the correct play clear for most hand examples. My only complaint would be that this analysis pertains only to raised pot, without the necessary adjustments for 3-bet pots. Limped pots aren't covered either, but I guess these are a lot less important.
Episodes four and seven are live play. In the fourth one, tubasteve plays two tables of 25NL in a fairly tight style (although not quite as tight as in Baby Steps 1). In the seventh one, n0whereman LAGs it up on two tables of 50NL, notably on Stars, not the more usual FTP. Both videos are quite good. The hero call made by n0whereman against a shove after tubasteve persuaded him to is pure genius. Also, n0whereman varies his preflop raise sizing quite a lot depending on position in a quite interesting fashion. It's a pity his reasoning is never described, but I think seeing him do that is also quite useful, since it's valuable food for thought (although for now I mostly just pot it, occasionally 3x-ing versus regs on the button).
Episode five is preflop play again. As I've already mentioned, it shows a few ways to open up one's game. The most important one is isolating widely against limpers, since there are a lot of these donks in the micros and very few people will 3-bet you light if you start isolating a lot. This episode also continues the discussion of 3-betting, 4-betting and 5-bet-shoving.
The sixth video is about turn play. Like the rest of the series it puts the most emphasis on value-betting, which is certainly the most important thing to do in the micros, but other things, like good spots for double barrelling, are discussed. Also, Baluga theorem, an instrument that can probably save a ton of money in the long run, is introduced.
Video eight is obviously about river play... Actually it isn't. Apart from a few minor points, this is the only thing I didn't like in the series: the absence of a river play episode. The actual hands review with Joe Tall was a blast to watch, but it doesn't completely make up for the absence of information on the most important street (I call it the most important, because the bets are the biggest - it also comes up the least often, so a case could be easily made, I guess, for the most important street being preflop). I do think that the viewer is, thankfully, not entirely in the dark, since value betting is still very important on the river and the Bakluga theorem still holds, but some more details would have been welcome.
Overall, I'm quite happy I've joined DC and I think I've got a lot out of watching these two series. Next in my plan is Wilt On Tilt's Real Life uNL Grinder, although Balugawhale's and tubasteve's The Coaching Tree seems very tempting too. There certainly is quite a lot of stuff to learn from on DC :)
Guess where I pasted this from? From bkowal's LJ, that's where. I'm really sorry BK didn't Top 8 last week-end, but his comeback story's a good one as it is.
Matt Flynn, Sunny Mehta, Ed Miller. Professional No-Limit Hold'em, Vol. 1. The title is a perfect misnomer here, since volume 2 will be published as a separate book (Small Stakes NLH) and anyway, there isn't a lot to the word professional here, since the book is a primer for relative beginners. The concepts are covered fairly well, although the authors do seem to ride their hobby horse, SPR, too far on occasion, but the hand example are suspect, to say the least. Min-3-betting AQs OOP? Gimme a break. All in all, a useful read, but it might very well be that HOH 1 is a better cash game primer and NLHTAP is a more important book overall. And if you're looking to play 6-max, ryanfee.com offers a free guide that will certainly be more useful.
My earnings have been decent in spite of the Ney Year holidays. Even more importantly, I started participating in alex_levitas's personal finance group, which led to my having a clear $ plan for the year.
Poker-wise, I've learned quite a lot. I played well more than a hundred HU Sit'n'Goes, doing slightly better than breakeven, but learning a lot in the process. I've also found an affordable coach for 6-max NL cash games, so I'll concentrate on those from now on (probably switching to a site that allows rakeback, since Stars VIP program doesn't do much for uNL players), but I'll go on playing HU occasionally, since the skills I get in HU play are good for my overall development as a poker player. Besides, one can play a HUSNG in just 15 min or less, whereas there's little point in sitting down to play 6-max cash for less than an hour.
My Go play wasn't good at all during January, even though I experienced a marginal improvement in solving problems. My main problem was inability to concentrate throughout a full game. I've always been one for losing won games, alas, but in January I've most certainly surpassed my previous accomplishments in that field. I've decided to take a break from Go for a while, at least for February, especially considering that I have a decent amount of work now and I want to concentrate on poker. I'll still be teaching my weekly class, so I probably won't forget everything I know.
I've read a few great books:
Jane Austen. Emma. For some reason I haven’t read this novel before. While not the most ambitios of her works (that award probably goes to Mansfield Park), this one is quite probably the best. What it lack in the sparkling charm of Pride And Prejudice, it makes for by the quiet contemplativeness of the narration. Interestingly, Emma is much less immediately likeable than Elizabeth; in the beginning of the book she even provoked my anger by her behaviour in the whole George Martin affair. However, by the end of the book one cannot help loving her and her happiness, even if guaranteed by the laws of the genre, becomes the subjict of ever increasing concern of the reader. If anything can be said at all to be amiss with the book, it is that the Harriet Smith menace towards the very end seems a little exaggerated, although one could also contend that it is the sign of Emma’s new-found modesty.
Haruki Murakami. What I talk About When I talk About Running. This collection of essays about running (a couple of them also deal with swimming and cycling), while small, might easily turn out to be among the more important books I read this year. It certainly wouldn’t be like that for everyone, but somehow it seems to have fallen into my hands at exactly the right time , a time when I am contemplating important changes in my life. Its lessons are simple and unexciting, but the strength the author shows throughout its pages is very impressive. Note to self: re-read this in a year or so.
“The Day Of the Triffids” by John Wyndham is of course a very famous book, but even knowing that I was very much surprised by just how well it was written. The plot is superb, the heroes are very life-like and three-dimensional and the style is great. Overall, a great pleasure of a novel. “Heads-Up No Limit Hold’em” is the only book on its subject, but a great one fortunately. I got a lot of use out of the first reading, but I plan to re-read it taking notes and I’ll probably also return to it periodically so long as I continue playing HU poker.
I've also re-read Pavich's "The Inner Side of Wind", but while interesting, the novel didn't do much for me, I must confess. Now I'm reading Iain M. Banks's "The Algebraist" and it is fascinating.
I've seen three movies: The Discrete Charm of Bourgeoisie (a masterpiece, obviously), Stilyagi, a very interesting anti-Soviet musical feature, and Vicky Cristina Barselona, the latest film by Woodie Allen, which was clearly shot by a master, but seemed somehow a little hollow to me. Of course, Penelope Cruz's performance was nothing less but superb.
I've reviewed The Waste Land, Part One. My goal for February will be to learn the first half of Part Two.
Overall, I'm progressing well towards all my goals except Go, but that'll just have to wait.
Прочитать о книге можно по ссылке: http://alex-levitas.livejournal.com/950
Usually I just write my goals for the next year on paper, but today I'll try to sum them up here in no particular order:
(1) Shape a healthy lifestyle for myself, with daily tsigong exercises, at least semi-weekly wushu training and an overall balanced diet
(2) earn X1 roubles (lessons, translations and the occasional M:tG tourney) and save X2 roubles
(3) two trips with my family: Israel in spring and a brief vacation with my wife in Rome in December
(4) poker: be ready to move up to SSNL both skill-wise (esp. hand-reading and value-betting on the river) and bankroll-wise (BR of $4k)
(5) Go: a firm shodan rating; ten pro games memorized up to and including ooyose
(6) reading: I am too lazy to copy the lists here, but the goals are to read 100% of list one and 75% of list two (the longer one).
(7) see two dozen movies
(8) an important thing that escaped me when I first wrote my post: learn "The Waste Land" by heart
No less importantly, I'll review my progress at the end of 2009.
